Search
Each floor of Ingolstadt its torture chambersTwo budding entrepreneurs within the gloveA project also denounced by Impala which jWill it succeed The short answer is Yes but with the forcepsIt is the highest monthly increase for eight yearsEach institution has thus equipped with laptop computersAcquisition Broadens Pressure Sensitive Adhesives OfferingSTHumira sales jumped almost 42 percent to 15 orreach their anticipated repayment date 5 The WUA collective bargaining agreement with MLB expires on DecCan Europe speak with one voice Today, the question arises at the IMF. While the international monetary Fund (IMF) has launched the construction of a reform to strengthen the role of the major emerging countries, the idea of a single representation of Europe reappears. Minister of finance Finnish Eero Heinaluoma, whose country chairs the European Union (EU), said that the Union should "speak more with one voice" in the major international institutions. Erkki Liikanen, one of the members of the Council of the European Central Bank (ECB), considers that "it would be a good way to get a stronger European identity".
But the consolidation of European forces in the IMF is of the puzzle. It runs first to a question from perimeter. Should unify the 25 countries of the Union or be limited to only the euro area countries According to the President of the Eurogroup, Jean-Claude Juncker "the eurozone must be represented by a single representative, which implies a number of arrangements in international institutions". For once in agreement with Mr Juncker, the President of the ECB, Jean-Claude Trichet, notes that arrangements have been found that the ECB headquarters to finance G7, G10, G20 and that the EU be represented at the level of the g-8 heads of State. "I fully support the unique representation of the euro area in international forums, including official institutions", he said. At this point, it appears that the consolidation on the basis of the euro area seems to hold the rope. Even if it is not easy to obtain.
Indeed, the IMF now brings together 184 Member countries, each represented on the Board of Governors by their Minister of finance or the leader of the Central Bank. They meet a year, usually in the fall, at a general meeting. For the management of the day-to-day business of the Fund, however, a Board of Directors, now chaired by Rodrigo Rato, was formed. This Board is composed of 24 seats or constituencies in which 184 Member countries are represented. It organizes its work according to the directions of the monetary and Financial Committee (IMFC) international, which meets twice a year and consists of the Finance Ministers of guardianship of the 24 directors, appointed for four years.
The simple observation of these 24 districts gives an idea of the difficulty of consolidating the European position at the level of the Union. The 25 countries are scattered in... 10 of the 24 districts. The France, the Germany, the United Kingdom have each an own administrator. In contrast, the Italy is on the side of the Greece with the Albania, Malta, the Portugal, San Marino and Timor-Leste. The Italian administrator who sits today defends the interests of these countries. The Spain teamed up with Costa Rica, the El Salvador, the Guatemala, the Honduras, the Mexico, the Nicaragua and the Venezuela. Mexican administrator who is currently the seat will leave its place, on 1 November, a Venezuelan. The Poland, it is attached to the Switzerland and the countries of Central Asia and their seat is occupied by a Swiss Director. The Belgium done with the Austria and the Turkey, while the Netherlands are on the side of the Ukraine, the Romania and Israel.
The readjustment of boundaries is all the more difficult to consider that some small European countries refuse the idea to blend into a European constituency. The Dutch Director of the IMF, Jeroen Kremers, said loud and clear. For him, the Fund is an organization of member countries and the EU is not a country. And even if Europe overcame this obstacle, another would be immediately: to which would be the place of the European single administrator Its mandate is four years, each of the 25 European countries be this Chair once per century "We would then in the worse than Africa where the interests of an entire continent is concentrated in two electoral districts", note a European of the IMF. Hardly imaginable to many Governments of the old Continent. Especially if one keeps in memory that the European Union is very active in the IMF (it totals approximately 32 of the voting rights), that it represents about two-thirds of public aid to development, that the Nordic countries spend much of their resources in this area and that Britain will remain no doubt reluctant to delegate his authority to the continental.
The issue of the representation would arise with almost as many acuity at the level of the euro area. The logic would like that to the President of the Eurogroup, namely Jean-Claude Juncker, participates alongside the President of the ECB at the g-7 Finance and the IMFC. As the sole Director of the euro area, what will be the rules of his appointment and his nationality The France or the Germany will accept to see one of their national citizen this seat only every forty-eight years Or will it grant more importance to heavy goods vehicles in the area the Germany, the France, the Italy... and establish a rule similar to that in force for the composition of the Board of Governors of the ECB All these questions remain unanswered and probably claim the Eurogroup Finance Ministers in the coming months. Beautiful wrangling in prospect.
